COMAH Regulations 2015:

The Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) Regulations 2015 cover sites which are used for storing and/ or processing hazardous substances. The amounts of hazardous materials allowed, on site, depends on the relative risk from each product stored.

The old COMAH regulations reference the CHIP regulations to determine scope. COMAH 2015

references the European Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures Regulation (2008) (CLP).

Sites which newly come into COMAH or newly become upper tier will need to fully understand the requirements.

Every site of a business will need

 to:

  • determine whether they are in scope of COMAH 2015 and notify or re-notify the Competent Authority by 1 June 2016.
  • upper tier COMAH sites have to prepare a safety report which demonstrates the above.
  • take all necessary measures to prevent major accidents involving dangerous substances.
  • limit the consequences to people and the environment of any major accidents which do occur.

Existing COMAH sites that have safety reports due before June 2016 are encouraged to write them in a way that is compliant with COMAH 2015 to avoid additional work.

Sites can be: Non-COMAH (Low Potential Risk), Lower Tier COMAH (Medium Potential risk) or Top Tier COMAH (Higher Potential Risk). Some higher risk materials can put a site into Lower Tier COMAH, even with quite low inventories:

  • Acute Toxic category 1- 5.0 Tonnes
  • Flammable Liquids (P5A)- 10.0 Tonnes
  • Formaldehyde (90% plus)- 5.0 Tonnes
Other products can be found in the tables of Schedule 1 of the new regulations (from page 28): http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/483/contents/made

The Current COMAH regulations 1999 are based on the Seveso II directive. They are being replaced by Regulations based on European Seveso III Directive.

The aim of the COMAH regulations is to try and prevent Major Accidents at medium-higher potential risk sites, like the ones which took place in the UK: 

  • 2005- Buncefield- 43 Injured, 1 Billion pounds worth of damage.
  • 2001- Port Talbot- 3 Fatalities, 12 serious injuries.
  • 1988- Piper Alpha- 167 Fatalities.
  • 1974- Flixborough- 28 Fatalities, 36 serious injuries.

Relatively small incidents on a COMAH site can quickly escalate, if appropriate safeguards are not in place. For example, a small fire on a low risk site may not be dealt with very quickly but without flammable materials, it may still be put out with standard fire extinguishers. The same incident on a COMAH site may lead to a fire very quickly escalating to a point where standard fire fighting equipment is useless. So fire prevention and robust protective measures are more important on any COMAH site.

The incident at Buncefield, near Hemel Hempstead, started when a large tank used for storing Petrol started to over flow accidentally. The level gauge on the massive tank was faulty and said that the tank was not full. These types of installations are now so automated that they are effectively run from a computer screen and the tank continued to overflow for some time, unnoticed, until the Petrol vapours found a source of ignition. 

At 06:01 am on Sunday 11th December 2005, this resulted in the largest peace time explosion in Western Europe. The explosion was heard as far away as the Netherlands, France and Belgium and it was measured at 2.4 on the Ritcher scale.

An estimated 1 Billion pounds worth of damage was caused, serious Environmental pollution was caused and 43 people were injured. The investigation said though but for the incident fortunately occurring on a Sunday, the injury toll could have been much worse.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buncefield_fire

The Seveso disaster occurred in the town of Seveso, Italy in July 1976. A chemical manufacturer was carrying out a exothermic chemical reaction. An exothermic reaction is a type of reaction, which produces heat. When such reactions take place the heat must be taken away by a means of cooling. If the heat is not taken away sufficiently, a runaway reaction can occur, where the temperature continues to increase faster and faster. 

When the chemical reactor in Seveso reached 230 Degrees Celsius the contents of the reactor started to spray out of a safety relief valve. Usually the reaction did not contain any Dioxin but with the temperature reaching much higher than the normal temperature for an ideal reaction, Dioxin was made as a side product.

Dioxin used to be used, many years ago, as a weed killer but was found to have serious affects on the environment and to human health, so was banned in most countries in the world. Dioxin is now known to cause many human/ animal cancers and birth defects.

A very wide area around Seveso and nearby towns occupied by over 100,000 people, was found to be contaminated by dangerous levels of Dioxin, following the incident.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seveso_disaster

Essentially the Seveso Directives and COMAH Regulations are intended to prevent Major Accidents, which could cause large numbers of fatalities and incidents which could cause widespread Environmental harm like Buncefield and Seveso.

COMAH Regulations 2015 come into force 1st June 2015 and incorporate the new requirements of the Seveso III Directive into UK Law.

If you need any advice on whether your organisation comes under the new COMAH Regulations, Wallett HSE Services can provide you expert advice on this. As this is such a complicated issue we will not go into the details in this article.

Also follow the link to the new regulations:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/483/contents/made


Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015

The CDM Regulations are still due to come into force on 6th April 2015, there could still be some minor changes in the regulations before this date, as the new regulations are quite controversial, in their content, particularly the inclusion of domestic premises in the requirement for CDM notifications (these were excluded from the old CDM 2007). For more information on the issue see our last article:

cdm-regs-2015-update.php

Transport firm fined £500,000 after Hull worker crushed between two lorries

A Cheshire-based transport company has been fined £500,000 after an Hull employee suffered horrific injuries when she was crushed between two lorries.

Warwick Crown Court heard (16 Mar) that Jennifer Rose was lucky to be alive after the incident at Tip Trailer Services’ Griff Lane depot in Nuneaton on 9 April 2013.

Mrs Rose, 38, who now lives in Hull, broke 13 bones in her back, shoulders and ribs, and punctured a lung. The incident left her with severe head injuries, impaired vision and she required a tracheotomy. She suffered a cardiac arrest and was in intensive care for ten days.

Mrs Rose, who has a young son, needed to wear a body brace for four months and was confined to a wheelchair for some months although has since regained some mobility. She still requires weekly physiotherapy.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found Mrs Rose was acting as a banksman, assisting a lorry driver to reverse park on a slope, at the time of the incident. The driver decoupled his trailer without engaging its parking brake, causing it to roll back and trap her between the two vehicles.

The investigation found TIP Trailer Services regularly allowed vehicles to park on a slope without the provision of chocks or similar devices. The company had no monitoring system to check whether drivers were applying their handbrakes properly.

The slope ended on a public road, so the risks were not just to pedestrians on site but also to passing pedestrians and drivers.

TIP Europe Ltd, of Market Street, Altrincham, Cheshire, trading as Tip Trailer Services, pleaded guilty to two breaches of Sections 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, and was fined a total of £500,000 and ordered to pay a further £56,938 in costs.

Speaking after the hearing, HSE inspector Elizabeth Hornsby said:

“Mrs Rose suffered severe life-changing injuries. Her family was told she would not survive the night but due to her level of physical fitness and her sheer determination she has fought back and is now on the road to recovery.

“It was common practice for drivers to park on a slope within the compound, which should never have been allowed as it was inevitable that sooner or later a driver would fail to put on their handbrake. This totally avoidable incident could and should have been prevented with nothing more than common sense.”

Information and guidance on how to manage the risks associated with workplace transport is available at www.hse.gov.uk/toolbox/transport.htm

Numerous serious and fatal incidents occur in the workplace involving collisions with pedestrians. Larger vehicles and fork lift truck have more blind spots than a car for instance. Larger vehicles have very large blind spots all around the vehicle. Fork lift trucks with a load on may have a very large blind spot at the front.

Workplace transport is a well known safety issue, particularly if large vehicles or fork lift trucks are used in a work place, safeguards expected by various approved codes of practice and health and safety guidance:

  • A risk assessment of workplace transport should be completed and appropriate safeguards implemented using a combination of the following control measures.
  • Adequate pedestrian/ vehicle segregation by using a combination of: barriers, fencing, signage, marked pedestrian routes and separate vehicle/ pedestrian exits.
  • Avoid reversing of any vehicles, if at all possible by using one ways systems or other practical means.
  • If reversing is not avoidable and trained/ competent reversing assistant or banksman is required.
  • High visibility clothing and appropriate lighting should be in place when appropriate.
  • All drivers must be appropriately trained and appropriate refresher training should be completed at least every 3-5 years.
  • Pedestrians should be excluded from higher risk areas.
  • Amber beacons and reversing alarms should be used on vehicles which are expected to reverse.
  • Appropriate speed limits should be in place.
  • All safety measures must be monitored and enforced by supervisors and management (company drivers and visiting drivers must be considered).

Company sentenced after worker loses fingers

A leading international aluminium fabricator has been fined after a worker severed two fingers when his left hand was trapped in the loading clamps of an aluminium metal extrusion machine. 

The 41-year-old from Tibshelf, Derbyshire, who does not want to be named, lost the end of his little finger and his ring finger to his second joint, as well as suffering burns, following the incident at Sapa Profiles UK on 18 March 2014. 

He was off work for eight months, after which he returned to the company in a different role. 

Chesterfield Magistrates’ Court heard today (18 March) that the man was working to unblock a machine that pushes out aluminium to produce a manufactured piece. Solid aluminium is fed into the machine and heated to around 450 degrees, to soften it, so it can be extruded into a die, which will create the final item. 

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the interlocks on the machine, did not fully isolate the power when opened. 

Access inside the press was required by employees to remove blockages from two points in the machine where they commonly occurred. This was a two person job. 

On the 18 March 2014, the injured person and another person entered the machine to remove one of these blockages. They accessed the machine through separate gates. The second person left the machine, closing his gate, leaving the injured person inside with his gate open. Unfortunately, having only the one gate open didn’t fully isolate the machine.  

So when the machine was restarted it allowed the loading  clamps to operate whilst the injured person was inside the danger zone. His hand was trapped, resulting in contact burns and serious finger injuries. 

The company had failed to carry out a risk assessment to the machine prior to making these crucial changes. 

Sapa Profiles UK Ltd, of Mansfield Road, Tibshelf, was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £1,784.50 in costs and a £120 victim surcharge, after pleading guilty to breaching regulation 3(1) of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. 

After sentencing, HSE inspector Lindsay Bentley said: “Sapa Profiles UK Ltd allowed access to the dangerous parts of the press, including the loading arms and clamps that injured the worker. 

“Furthermore, the company’s risk assessment was not suitable and sufficient to ensure that the relevant dangerous parts of the Press would stop before a person entered the Press. Following the incident it took just 10 minutes for these interlocks to be reprogrammed. 

“It should not have been possible to access a danger zone without the machine being safely isolated.  It meant operators who had to frequently unblock the machine were routinely exposed to unnecessary risk. ”

health and safety staffordshire